The Bradnam Blog

4 Aug 2010

Some possible headlines for tech writers covering the demise of Google Wave

Google Wave is no more. Many tech writers and bloggers will be sharpening their digital pencils, ready to write that killer article about the slow fade into obscurity of a star that once burned so brightly. Here are some suggested headlines:

Not waving but drowning - an end to Google Wave

Waving goodbye - an end to Google Wave

Software giant wavers - an end to Google Wave

The wave breaks - an end to Google Wave

No longer making waves - an end to Google Wave

Software gets waved aside - an end to Google Wave

Google waves the flag of surrender - an end to Google Wave

Shockwave - an end to Google Wave

No longer on the same wavelength - an end to Google Wave

Collapse of the wave function - an end to Google Wave

Update - August 5th

Another blog has collected some real titles from articles about Google Wave and have also included a couple more of their own invention. Guess I missed some good ones.

13 May 2010

What Google can tell us about facebook

There does seem to be somewhat of a backlash happening against facebook at the moment. This is evident from Google's auto-suggest feature. You only need to type the first four letters of the word 'delete' in order to see the following suggestion:

Content

A similar top suggestion will appear if you start typing 'deactivate'. Alternatively, just start typing 'how do I' to see an option appear for 'how do I delete my facebook account'. More surprisingly, if you type 'how to quit', you will see 'how to quit facebook' among the top suggestions, placed above 'how to quit gambling addiction'. If we also use Google's trends service, we can see that the phrase delete facebook, is growing in prominence. Though admittedly, this might just reflect the overall growth of facebook.

Even a simple Google news search for the word 'facebook' reveals that the majority of news stories about the social media giant seem to be negative at the moment. As this CNN story illustrates, it is becoming more newsworthy when famous tech pundits such as Leo Laporte decide to wave goodbye to Mark Zuckerberg's baby. I'm curious if facebook will start up their 'damage limitation machine' again, though it is increasingly a machine that is being put to work far too frequently.

Update (13th May)

Another senior tech figure (Christopher Breen, Senior Editor at Macworld) has also decided to decline to stay on facebook. Here are his reasons for doing so.

12 Feb 2010

The slow death of bioinformatics and the eternal popularity of shoes

I was playing around with Google Insights for Search today and randomly decided to see how the search term bioinformatics has fared over the last six years (this is as far back as you can search for a trend). This is what I found:

Initially I was quite surprised by this and so I then performed a search for genomics, only to seem the same sort of trend.

According to Google the Y-axis of these graphs reflect "how many searches have been done for a particular term, relative to the total number of searches done on Google over time" (emphasis on the word 'relative' is mine). This could just mean that the absolute number of search terms for 'bioinformatics' and 'genomics' is the same, or has even grown, but has been swamped by an increase in the frequency of all other search terms. To a lesser degree, there seems to be less searches occurring for many different biologically-related terms, e.g. here is the graph for the word biology.

On top of the overall declining trend, I like how you can clearly see a dip in the middle of each year. Presumably this is when millions of high-school kids take their long summer vacation and are therefore not searching about anything to do with school work. You can see similar annual 'wobbles' if you also search for chemistry or physics. So does this mean that all science-related searches are declining? Well, surely there is more interest in the newer fields of biology (and bioinformatics in particular) and the related technology. This does seem to be the case. Here is the graph for the search term 'next generation sequencing'. Clearly this term has exploded in popularity as the everybody moves to doing short-read sequencing as opposed to the traditional Sanger method.

So clearly, some topics are becoming hotter. However I still feel that the decline for the term bioinformatics might indeed represent a real decline in the whole field of bioinformatics. That is not to say that I think any less bioinformatics is being done these days, or that it is less 'worthy' as a field. Rather, I think bioinformatics has moved from being a specialist field that was carried out somewhat separately from 'traditional' wet-lab research, to something which is much more integrated with many other fields of research. There are still many dedicated bioinformatics group (the lab where I work is one such group), but I think it is increasingly common that more biologists need to (and want to) undertake some bioinformatics as part of their wider research. To me, bioinformatics has gone mainstream in biology and that means that it no longer makes sense to think of it as a separate field as such.

Anyway, regardless of whether any particular biological term is rising or falling in popularity, I think it is more interesting to see what search terms remain eternally popular. Despite changing governments, economic turmoil, and global uncertainty what is it that we search for with any degree of constancy? My first guess seemed to be a good one. So let me end by presenting the Google Insights graph for the search term shoes.